karlslittlesoapbox

31 January 2006

New Zogby Poll on State of the War

President Bush is under fire over his Iraq policies, as a majority of likely voters nationwide say they are not pleased with his handling of the war there, a new Zogby Interactive survey shows.
As the President delivers his annual State of the Union message, 55% of the voting public favors a phased withdrawal of troops from Iraq, believing the U.S. has accomplished all it realistically can in the Middle Eastern nation.

Many disagree that the enemy in Iraq is getting worn down and that the U.S. will eventually win the war. Just 40% agree with that statement, while 59% do not. Similarly, while 41% favor escalating the Iraq conflict, using more missiles and heavy artillery against insurgents -- but a 56% majority opposes this approach.

The survey finds the nation sharply divided over the Iraq conflict, with 49% agreeing with the proposition that America cannot win the war in Iraq and that Iraqis should be left to sort out their own future without U.S. or allied intervention. However, just as many oppose that view.
Despite the misgivings of many about the war, a 53% majority of voters oppose an immediate withdrawal -- although 46% favor this position.

The survey does find that the groups that supported President Bush's 2004 re-election -- including conservatives, rural voters, Protestants and evangelicals, regular churchgoers, men, the investor class and Republicans in general -- are much more likely to favor continued involvement in Iraq and are more likely to reject arguments favoring withdrawal from the region. And NASCAR fans -- one of the groups closely watched during the 2004 elections -- are solid war supporters.

However, the President does not win the hearts and minds of a number of other groups, including moderates and liberals, large city dwellers, Catholics, women, non-investors, and households containing members of a labor union. And among a number of key swing constituencies, including small city residents and suburbanites, there are clear signs of fatigue with the war.

The President may also have his work cut out for him in retaining support on the subject from lawmakers who are eyeing a future White House run. Asked whether they would support a presidential candidate in 2008 who aggressively supports the Iraq War, 36% of poll respondents said they would. By contrast, 43% said they would instead support a 2008 presidential candidate who believes nothing more can be accomplished in the region and that a continued U.S. presence would be counterproductive.

The interactive survey of 13,456 likely voters nationwide was conducted Jan. 27 through 30. It has a margin of error of +/- 0.9 percentage points.

6 Comments:

  • only two more years of the warmonger in office, can't wait untill he is gone, can't beleive we have someone in office that has no mastery of his own native language. One of my favorite quotes from him was " Civilized nations don't create weapons of mass destruction." Wow a really well thought out statement!!!! ( I myself have terrible grammar, but I do not represent our nation to the world either )

    By Blogger Royce, at 1:23 PM, January 31, 2006  

  • Hmmmm- don't do spellcheck on my posts either. HA HA Do any of us have all the answers to the worlds problems? I'm just glad I'm NOT the President! I wouldn't have wanted to deal with 9-11, Iraq or a Tsunami & hurricanes in New Orleans. Mr. Bush hasn't done a perfect job to be sure, but I don't think he's completely failing either. I'm registered Independant- so I don't have an iron in the fire for or against Bush. Just not sure anyone else in office would have dealt with things better. No matter which way a President goes, there's criticism. Must be a lot of pressure!!

    By Blogger Trailady, at 6:54 PM, January 31, 2006  

  • Im loyal to the President. I voted for him. I think hes done a good job considering all the mess he had to deal with. He cant protect us all from every evil or arrange things so we all prosper like never before. People can be very naieve at times, but hey you can never please everyone.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:15 PM, January 31, 2006  

  • Too sloopy, on national tv on the discovery channel, they showed where our administration had the plans for the world trade center attack 5 years earlier off of a laptop the confiscated in Bali after a nightclub bombing. The only reason we are over there is oil, and the fact that Isreal brutally rape, kills, and tortures muslim citizens ( National Geopraphic story, not conspiracy theory lunatics ) and the only reason Isreal was re-established as a nation and the only reason it continues to be a nation is that the US protects them. If we removed our support away from Isreal we would have no problems with Muslim terrorists. And why would a mostly christian country support and help keep alive a nation that flat rejected and murdered their saviour, OIL. Screwed up. PS do you know why North Korea started their nuclear program back up, Bush cut off the supply of cheap oil that Clinton promised them to power their country, they have no coal or hydroelectric infrastructure, The only thing they have is nuclear or oil. And they cannot afford oil, so they go nuclear. Bush has messed up the economy, put us in a situation with Iran we cannot win, If we attack Iran the US is in for some serious crap. Wait, remember this conversation. And all the while many of companies over rebuilding Afghanastan an Iraq are companies owned by the Bush family. P.S. the only reason the Muja Hadiin fought the Soviet Union for 20 plus years is because the U.S. supplied them weapons and training ( the US made a big deal on the news about the stinger missles they were giving the Afghanastan freedom fighters to shoot down the Soviet Hind helicopter. An armored gun platform used to wipe out villages at a time) and promised them we would rebuild their country. 20 something years of brutal treatment and a long war of attrition was rewarded by abandonment by the US. 911 was a direct result of the US's poor treatment of the Muslim world, and Mr. Bush Is getting rich off it. You can research all of this, I don't tend to listen to extremist like Michael Moore, he may be right, he may be wrong, but his eccentric position removes credence from his documentaries. So please don't accuse me of being a conspiracy theory nut.

    By Blogger Royce, at 10:05 AM, February 02, 2006  

  • Anyone who believes that Bush is leading the country in the right direction is, well, let's see, there's a little over 1/2 of us in the country who DON'T believe that. And I know from my own research that Royce is correct. All one has to do is research and put just a teensy bit of effort into finding out what's being told and what the truth actually is. If we really had someone who was a "compassionate" person running the country we would NOT have the problems we have. And anyone who doesn't believe we've got a lot of problems or that the president and his big business supports aren't to blame for it is in complete denial. The man is a liar. All Clinton did was have sex, ok, so maybe he was wishy washy, but we never had a WAR while he was in office. We all got better off financially and we were not attacked in the way that we were once W stumbled into office. OK, well, that's enough. Royce is right.
    NS

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:35 PM, February 02, 2006  

  • Im not saying the President hasn't made mistakes. Hes human! Just doubt any of us could do better with the circumstances. I supported Clinton when he was in office. Not because I saw eye to eye with him on everything, but because he was the leader of our country. I think if people would be good sports when thier man doesnt get in office and stand behind the Pres instead of throwing a fit, trying to make him look bad and distracting him from his job, things would be better. Every single administration has its ups and downs.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:18 AM, February 08, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home